India's UNSC Bid for 2028-29

India's UNSC Bid for 2028-29

#GS-2 #Current Events #International #India's UNSC Bid for 2028-29 #United Nations Security Council #Global Diplomacy

Key takeaways

  • India is campaigning for a non-permanent seat on the UNSC for the 2028-29 term after finishing eight past terms.
  • Securing a seat requires winning a two-thirds majority in the UNGA, translating to an absolute minimum of 129 votes.
  • India secured landslide victories with 187 out of 191 votes in 2010 and 184 out of 192 votes in 2020 when running unopposed.
  • Tajikistan presents a strong challenge for the Asia-Pacific seat with backing from Central Asian nations and the 57-member Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

Why in News

  • Following the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York, India stepped up its diplomatic efforts.
  • New Delhi is actively campaigning for a non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) for the 2028-29 term.

About India's UNSC Bid

  • The UNSC consists of 15 members in total, split into five permanent members and 10 non-permanent members.
  • Non-permanent members serve staggered two-year terms that do not run consecutively.
  • The 10 seats are divided among regions: the African Group gets three, the Asia-Pacific Group gets two, the Latin American and Caribbean Group (GRULAC) gets two, the Western European and Others Group (WEOG) gets two, and the Eastern European Group gets one.
  • The Asia-Pacific seat opens up once every year.
  • Winning a seat requires a two-thirds majority of members present and voting in the 193-member UNGA.
  • This means a candidate needs at least 129 affirmative votes if every member state votes.
  • Regional groups usually negotiate a single consensus candidate decades early so the UNGA approves them easily without a contest.

India's Track Record and Electoral Math

  • India has completed eight terms on the UNSC: 1950-51, 1967-68, 1972-73, 1977-78, 1984-85, 1991-92, 2011-12, and 2021-22.
  • When running unopposed with regional backing, India won massive support: 187 out of 191 votes in 2010 and 184 out of 192 votes in 2020.
  • Whenever regional consensus broke down in the past, India lost the elections.
  • In 1975, India lost to Pakistan.
  • In 1996, India lost badly to Japan by a vote count of 142 to 40.
  • To win the 2028-29 seat in June 2027 against an opponent, India must gather at least 129 votes across different voting groups.

Why India is Seeking a Ninth Term

  • India's previous term was disrupted by COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine conflict, leaving goals like counter-terrorism reform incomplete.
  • Permanent seat expansion talks under the Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN) are stuck because of opposition from the Coffee Club and P5 vetoes.
  • Running for non-permanent seats keeps India involved in core global governance discussions.
  • A seat at the main table allows India to speak up for developing economies on climate finance and debt relief.

Challenges

  • Many countries in the UNGA now prefer smaller nations that have never held a council seat instead of larger, frequent members.
  • For example, Tajikistan based its run on representing small nations, much like Kyrgyzstan beating the Philippines earlier.
  • Tajikistan enjoys backing from Central Asian neighbors and the 57-member Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).
  • Global South countries are increasingly voting against major powers during geopolitical disagreements.
  • For example, Portugal and Austria defeated Germany in the WEOG elections after developing nations criticized Western policies.
  • Fighting an election against Tajikistan could harm India's relations with a vital Central Asian security partner.
  • Tajikistan previously gave India access to the Ayni air base and Farkhor hospital facility for security operations.

Way Forward

  • India can fight the election in the UNGA by building support across the Global North, ASEAN, and Pacific Island countries to reach 129 votes.
  • India can talk to Dushanbe and ask them to step aside in return for Indian support in a future term.
  • India successfully used this tactic with Kazakhstan in 2010 and Afghanistan in 2013.
  • India can delay its bid to the 2029 or 2030 cycle to secure a peaceful consensus.
  • This polite delay would show India as a leader of the Global South while protecting ties with Central Asia.